What is better iPhone samsung a5. What is better than the iPhone (iPhone) or Samsung (Samsung) - a review of two models of different generations. The SIM card is used in mobile devices to store data that certifies the authenticity of mobile service subscribers.
I'll start with the fact that with the release of the very first iphone used only by them. And I'm not a fan, it just happened. The last year and a half has been iphone 5s. But iOS was already sick of bitter radish, I wanted a big screen, another operating system, more features, in general it was very interesting to try android. What else does not suit already in the iphone is the small size of the memory (I have 16 GB) and the constantly discharging battery (but this is already wear), well, of course, the price is now just space with my income, I just can’t give 50 thousand for the phone.
Start the mobile transfer and enter transfer mode
In addition to contacts, he can also transfer photos, videos, music and other documents. Transmitted data is enough to meet your needs. In addition, you can simply transfer phone data to another phone in three steps. The method of operation is simple and fast. Note. Please do not allow the connection to interrupt your data transfer, just keep the phones well connected during the entire transfer.
More than you might be interested
You never know what will happen when an accident, with the exception of a rainy day, is always better than quick wits. 
The difference in area is even clearer: 44 vs. 71, 7 square centimeters. 
Both displays are very sharp. 
Both screens are very good. 
The differences are small, both phones are very fast. 
Round edges are good in hand, the surface is comfortable. 
Both devices have a fingerprint sensor that saves unlock code entry. The differences are too small for a clear winner, therefore: a draw. 
This saves the use of the bracelet.
So I chose very long and painfully new phone, the camera was very important, because I have a small child and I generally like to take a lot of pictures on the phone, the presence of a memory card, a large screen (from 5 inches). I looked at Sony for a long time, I really like the design, but the camera didn’t like it very much. It makes noises - I don’t like this effect (after all, after updating the android to 5.1, Sony’s camera started to shoot better - my husband’s z2).
How well can displays be displayed? In the test, the diamond tip pushes against the surface with an effort - from 1 mN to 100 mN. Both screens passed the test perfectly. Because of the durable screen, the result is: undefined. 
Dives up to one meter must withstand 30 minutes without damage.
Each doubling the amount of memory costs 100 euros. 
Therefore, there is a draw. Security. Using a bracelet makes it unnecessary. Scratch resistance: the force with which the diamond tip presses against the surface increases from 1 mN to 100 mN. Good displays Do not “scratch” it. There is a draw because of the durable screen. Each doubling costs 100 euros.
So after a long reading of reviews and comparisons of the cameras of smartphones, I concluded that best camera on android at samsung. Galaxy S5 categorically did not like the design (namely, judging by the reviews, the camera is good) and I concluded that since the s5 camera is good, then the A5 should also be good. This was my main mistake. In my hands, of course, I turned both phones in and took pictures, but for some reason in the store I didn’t notice the difference in the photo.
Which smartphone is in a fight ahead? Scale and caliper cannot be blinded by polished edges, so this comparison is also associated with hard facts. Battery life, speed, image quality, reception, photo quality: not taste, but performance. The results can be found above in the review.
The test also concerns the distance between each other and the weighting of individual disciplines, and not just the decision about the chapter. Scope of delivery: opening and closing work out well, but a flap can interfere with the docking station. This makes it necessary to check the cameras on each phone to come to a conclusion on this issue.
So, buying a new one Samsung galaxy A5 and when I came home, I just took the first photo and I had a shiver through my body because I bought what I now have to do with it))) here's a photo:
Everything is blurry and blurred. It was a day, the photo was taken in front of the open balcony!
Important note! I’m not sure if this is the case on all devices, but when I’m looking at this review through my phone, it’s clear that all the photos are cut down in quality. So if photo comparison is important to you, then it’s best to watch a review. from the computer. I also do not exclude that the quality is not compressed from another browser on the phone or simply from another phone.
It should, however, be noted that battery life may vary depending on which device uses the device. Discovering the offers of competing manufacturers: there are tons of good quality smartphones, even very good ones, which are sold cheaper. Upon arrival, you may have to start from the terminals, which we do not necessarily expect.
And its price of 400 euros, is a strong argument. It offers a wider screen of excellent quality, high quality finishes with an aluminum shell and very thin edges. Despite its 13-megapixel sensor, photos taken by remnants of fairly general quality, albeit honorable.
After this photo, I photographed all day, it seemed to adapt myself to making clearer and brighter photos, but looking at the photos from the old iPhone was terribly upset that you had to dance with tambourines to get less acceptable photos while on the iPhone everything is simple. There may be a matter of habit, of course. To be fair, I’ll say that the iPhone doesn’t have an ideal camera either, especially in low light and indoors, plus such a screen in an iPhone that everything seems very beautiful, like a picture (by the way, I didn’t appreciate the praised Samsung amolyde, the screen is less blind in the sun)
Its screen is slightly larger and better defined. Again, a fingerprint reader is integrated. This increases production, but also improves quality. There are no curved screen holes that are ergonomic due to unwanted activation of everything and everything. Glass is relatively slippery, but with moderate dimensions it is not a problem. The cell phone is narrow, with an average amount of thin bezel and a solid 5% front surface makes the display easy to use even for people with smaller palm trees. The location of the keys and holes is quite unusual.
Here is a photo comparison:
Samsung Galaxy A5:
Here are some more photos just from the Samsung: on the street, shooting is good enough, but it still darkens even if the light is bright.
There is an ignition key in the right, and a loudspeaker above it! A strange but excellent solution if you have a mono speaker, because you will not cover it during the game. He looks back at the camera, where the camera is not compressed. Rating: 89 8. Most of the time it is difficult to determine whether it is gray or bluish, depending on the angle of view and lighting conditions.
Less than two photographs are drawn one after another, look at the color difference. Color is polarized: you like it, or it is not associated with you. And if you do not like it, there is a Black sky, golden sand, a peach cloud. The overall impression of the case is very good, this is the flagship class with all the parameters.
For justice, I’ll add photos that turned out well: (mostly macro shoots well in daylight)
This is fine, but it leads to a failure in color accuracy, which is best suited for basic settings. This also applies to other brands. If possible, close the phone a few inches of the nose. The overall impression on the screen: very good, better not exist in the upper middle class.
These are well-known nuclei, average characteristics, but in this case they are assembled in an advanced 14-nm manufacturing process. This means that it can operate at higher frequencies with less power consumption. We had mobile phones with similar test results that work very trivially.
Only a few animated ads will slow it down, it will hurt, but soon it will continue, smoothly compressing. Most games run smoothly, we know that they are made for weaker equipment, so we don’t have too many complaints about it. Good job and active noise reduction, so the conversation is always pleasant, in all situations.
We really liked the location of the monaural speaker - on the right side, at the top. The sound quality is good, but the speaker is somewhat quieter than average. In turn, it does not distort the sound when high levels volume. The 5 mm audio output, which is slowly shutting down, has good performance. What kind of headphones we do not know, we did not have mobile phone with retail package. The signal quality is very good, at least in Zagreb.
In general, I can say that the shell of the android from Samsung I did not like so much like that of Sony, but this is a matter of taste. I had a samsung when at school, a folding bed - and so IMHO the style was preserved :) just as clumsy, not very nice and not at all modern. Of course, the main disadvantage for me is the camera - it’s very dark (compared to iPhone), the images are fuzzy, blurred, gloomy, faded and not bright, you need to try hard to make it good photo, hdr mode It’s not a car, but you need to turn on a special mode (as something called a bright photo or something like that), if you shoot with this mode you need to wait for image processing for a long time, shooting is far from immediate.
The screen of a mobile device is characterized by its technology, resolution, pixel density, diagonal length, color depth, etc.
This is a pure comparison, and Iman Victor, a Chinese with a 800 mAh battery, has fallen so badly. The battery takes about an hour and 15 minutes to charge. This year, if you ask. But in fact this is the only serious objection to software. And it looks good if you ask us. There is no performance in this class. cell phone. Of course, many applications are duplicated.
Of the benefits, I note:
- really nice beautiful slim metal case - I had a white one, the back cover is a little pearl, it looks fine, it did not matter (unlike galaxy s5 which is in my opinion a quiet horror)
- large bright screen (not only the photo)))
- android and a lot of features (but the shell did not like it)
I was extremely glad that they took my phone back to the store - the phone was of course in perfect condition and the box and everything else, but still unpacked. I was not sure what to take - thank God took! I bought it in sitilinka, from now on I love this store :)) I'm not sure that I would take it everywhere. Thank God not bought in the online store. While I returned to the old iPhone, but the android is luring, I'll still buy Sony, I'm probably waiting for the new M5.
And yes, it takes them and when it is disabled. The difference lies in the camera's self-service fixed focus. The interface is different from the current, more detailed settings cameras that you call by sweeping to the right. There is a decision to take two or three photos, at least one will be sharp.
Because, in addition, the photos are very good in excellent quality. Contrast, color and dynamic range are perfect, no problem with any flagship cell phone. Even under low light conditions, the image quality is very good, with relatively little noise.
Update after some time:
I don’t regret having handed over my phone - all the same, Samsung is not mine and the camera was upset then. But now I look at the saved photos and compare them with the iPhone - well, the difference was not so critical. Now I think that the difference in photo quality seemed huge because I compared the photos on different devices respectively. When I watch everything on the computer - all the flaws of the photo from the iPhone are visible and the difference seems not so big. This circumstance still does not do Samsung honor - the screen resolution of the A5 is not awful, so the photo looks mediocre. The iPhone, though it fotka in the room, is also so-so, but the screen is good and the photos look much better. Yes, it is quite a controversial plus, but enjoyable. Added some photos that turned out perfectly on the Samsung to restore justice :)
This means that if you have longer arms and shoot confident hands, you will get slightly defocused photos. In this case, the suicide looks like this. Sharpness is at the top of the line, just like color, contrast, and dynamic range. Focus is very fast, watch the video. But there is one big drawback - the lack of image stabilization, whether electronic or optical, so the video is very sharp. Damage is paramount to other parameters.
The overall impression of the cameras is love - hate relationships. Well, there is a means to stabilize photos - you shoot more photos from the same photo. This is the general impression that it did not save when creating this cell phone. Another battle for the throne of the king of photomobiles. Photo contest of the year can begin! Let's start with the general introduction of both actors of our modern photodiode.
Update 2 :)
Update 3 :)) LG broke down (because of my fault, a child peed on it)), bought a Asus ZenFone selfie, also a class. The camera is almost like a LG.
The new generation of devices of the Galaxy A line has already been announced and we can get to know the Galaxy A7 (2016) and the Galaxy A5 (2016) better. We are especially interested in how good their cameras are and, in order to get a better idea, we will compare them with each other and with Apple’s current flagship iPhone 6S.
The Galaxy A7 (2016) and Galaxy A5 (2016) smartphones are extremely similar: both have the same design, but different screen sizes.
In terms of camera performance, both are also identical: the same 13-megapixel main camera with f / 1.9 aperture and optical stabilization, as well as front-camera at 5 MP.
We are curious about how high-quality images are obtained compared to iPhone smartphone 6S, which is equipped with one of the best sensors on the market.
General impressions
After several days of testing Galaxy devices in various conditions, we came to this conclusion: the new Galaxy A7 and Galaxy A5 have identical cameras. For all the time we did not see significant differences in the quality of photos, so we believe that both phones have the same camera.They shoot quickly and efficiently. Shortcut " Quick start”(Double pressing the“ Home ”button) opens the camera application almost perfectly. The problem of a random launch was not observed. The application menu is the same as the Galaxy S6 and Galaxy Note 5: convenient separate buttons for creating photos and recording videos, as well as buttons for switching between the front and main cameras are located below, where they are easy to get.
Image quality comparison
Samsung Galaxy A7 / A5 doesn’t actually take a bad shot, but they look a bit blurry. Apple iPhone 6S, by comparison, captures much more dynamic frames that are more pleasant to watch. He manages to take more saturated and clear pictures. You can verify this by reviewing the images below.
The second shot, taken on a smartphone from Samsung, looks more interesting. It is characterized by a natural display of colors. The iPhone, in turn, shows a more impressive picture: the colors are deep and perhaps even too much, although the image seems more vivid. You will see the difference if you compare the sky in both photos.
The heroes of our comparison encountered another difficult scene near the bar. And here Galaxy devices lost to their rival. Although both phones are equipped with optical stabilization, their cameras could not manage to take a clear picture. The iPhone has only digital stabilization, and it showed itself much better than the Galaxy A7 2016 and Galaxy A5 2016. The American gadget can shoot at ISO 640 with an impressive shutter speed of 1/17 second, while the South Korean at ISO 1250 and shutter speed 1 / 8 seconds.
When it comes to selfies, both smartphones in the Galaxy line have good shots with a wide viewing angle. So you can take a selfie with all your friends without any problems. The iPhone is completely different: it is rather difficult to take pictures with several people at once, they simply do not fit. Also quite noticeable is the difference in colors. Pictures taken on the Galaxy A7 / A5, look more real, while the iPhone 6S clearly oversaturated colors.
Video quality comparison
Samsung has equipped the Galaxy A7 (2016) and the Galaxy A5 (2016) with cameras that can shoot at 1080p resolution at 30 frames per second. Apple, in turn, equipped its flagship module, providing the user with video recording in 4K-resolution.The difference is big: the American producer’s smartphone makes videos with much better clarity than the South Korean one, and this is what you will immediately notice when you watch the video on a 1080p screen.
According to our initial impressions, the iPhone 6S has a wider image dynamics and is able to more effectively cope with the tasks set in difficult conditions. When the sun shines directly on the lens, the iPhone camera does not distort the picture and it manages to provide a balanced frame, although the Galaxy is also not bad, but not perfect.
Results
The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016) and Galaxy A5 (2016) cameras, as we have said, are identical. Both cope with their task well, but not excellent. Of course, there is not enough time-lapse and support for recording video in 4K, although 1080p will be enough for many.Leave your feedback in the comments. How satisfied are you with the quality of photos taken on Galaxy A7 / A5 (2016)?